<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Bit Pessimistic but a Cutie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ignitematchmaking.com/bachelorette-search/low-maintenance-cutie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ignitematchmaking.com/bachelorette-search/low-maintenance-cutie/</link>
	<description>We are Denver matchmakers who will introduce you to the kind of women you love.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 21:58:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ignite08</title>
		<link>http://www.ignitematchmaking.com/bachelorette-search/low-maintenance-cutie/comment-page-1/#comment-533</link>
		<dc:creator>ignite08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ignitematchmaking.com/dating/low-maintenance-cutie/#comment-533</guid>
		<description>Hey Ladies, This Bachelor is still single but has moved to Boston.  If you know of anyone with potential in Boston have them take a look!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ladies, This Bachelor is still single but has moved to Boston.  If you know of anyone with potential in Boston have them take a look!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ignite08</title>
		<link>http://www.ignitematchmaking.com/bachelorette-search/low-maintenance-cutie/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>ignite08</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ignitematchmaking.com/dating/low-maintenance-cutie/#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, that&#039;s a good question and open to different interpretations, but I think someone 40-50 can be cute, so I&#039;ll try to explain.  Cute would be someone that no one would consider unattractive but doesn&#039;t fall into the category of beautiful. Nice features, great smile but not some of the qualities you see on supermodels ie: sultry eyes, high cheek bones etc.  Am I making sense? This is harder to explain than I thought. He has shown me pictures of gals he had dated in the past and I classified them as cute vs. beautiful or average.  They weren&#039;t plain or dowdy but they weren&#039;t Nicolette Sheridan or Christie Brinkley either.  I guess beauty is in the eyes of the beholder after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, that&#8217;s a good question and open to different interpretations, but I think someone 40-50 can be cute, so I&#8217;ll try to explain.  Cute would be someone that no one would consider unattractive but doesn&#8217;t fall into the category of beautiful. Nice features, great smile but not some of the qualities you see on supermodels ie: sultry eyes, high cheek bones etc.  Am I making sense? This is harder to explain than I thought. He has shown me pictures of gals he had dated in the past and I classified them as cute vs. beautiful or average.  They weren&#8217;t plain or dowdy but they weren&#8217;t Nicolette Sheridan or Christie Brinkley either.  I guess beauty is in the eyes of the beholder after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amy</title>
		<link>http://www.ignitematchmaking.com/bachelorette-search/low-maintenance-cutie/comment-page-1/#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>amy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 04:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ignitematchmaking.com/dating/low-maintenance-cutie/#comment-118</guid>
		<description>Can you be more specific about &quot;petite&quot; and &quot;cute&quot;?  I hate to say it, but someone age 40-50 is rarely described as &quot;cute.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you be more specific about &#8220;petite&#8221; and &#8220;cute&#8221;?  I hate to say it, but someone age 40-50 is rarely described as &#8220;cute.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

